There are many
issues surrounding the invention of the internet we have to be aware
of after its invention, and now, explosive expansion. The legal
issues I have decided to discuss are domain name issues, free speech,
and spam.
As far as domain
name issues are concerned, many issues arise from something called
cybersquatting.
According
to the World Intellectual Property Organization or WIPO
(http://www.wipo.int/about-ip/en/studies/publications/domain_names.htm),
“...which
involves the per-emptive registration of trademarks by third parties
as domain names. Cybersquatters exploit the first-come, first-served
nature of the domain name registration system to register names of
trademarks, famous people or businesses with which they have no
connection.... As the holders of these registrations, cybersquatters
often then put the domain names up for auction, or offer them for
sale directly to the company or person involved, at prices far beyond
the cost of registration. Alternatively, they often keep the
registration and use the good name of the person or business
associated with that domain name to attract business for their own
sites.”
This
is deemed an unfair practice, and there have been many disputes over
this. That is why WIPO created the Uniform Domain Name Dispute
Resolution Policy, which permits complainants to file a case with a
resolution service provider.
The
issue of free speech has been brought up a few times in class. The
most prominent example that sticks out in my mind being “First
Monday In October.” But that had to do with porn on a film basis.
This example has to do with it on the internet. The first case
addressing the issue was Reno
vs. American Civil Liberties Union. This
attempt by Janet Reno to go against the ACLU in an attempt to protect
minors from pornographic material. On a website for Berkeley Students
(http://courses.ischool.berkeley.edu/i206/f97/GroupH/privacy.html),
it states that, “The
Supreme Court found the Communications Decency Act to be
unconstitutional because the expressions "
'transmissions'
and 'patently offensive display' were so vague as to abridge First
Amendment freedom of speech guarantees. Striking about the decision
is the fact that the entire court found the statute unconstitutional;
only O'Connor and Rhenquist did not join the majority opinion, yet
wrote a concurring opinion. The Court did not agree with the Justice
Department's argument that the Communications Decency Act was needed
in order to attract more people to the Internet (and thereby enhance
Internet commerce) because there is no indication that pornography on
the Internet is driving away potential users.”
It was struck down by the Supreme Court, but resulted in Title V of
the Telecommunications Act of 1996 to effect the internet.
And
for the last issue, spam. Everyone hates spam. But some people do
actually purchase items from spam, which motivates the spammers to
keep at it. As stated on the website for the Washington State Office
of the Attorney General
(http://www.atg.wa.gov/internetsafety/spam.aspx#.UnW58vlJOAg),
“The
Federal
Trade Commission, the agency with jurisdiction to receive and
investigate spam email complaints, reports receiving over 130,000
complaints a day. Almost 45 percent of all email is now spam and that
number is growing each year. Nearly three trillion spam messages are
sent each year — 13 times the total snail mail delivered by the
U.S. Postal service. The average wired American is hit with nearly
2,200 spam messages annually — this after most ISPs have filtered
80-90 percent of the junk messages. Some reports indicate that these
numbers could increase by five times in the near future. Junk email
is an issue not only reserved for individuals — it is estimated
that spam costs legitimate businesses $9 billion dollars a year.”
It looks as if spam is here to stay, because it is too difficult to
attempt to catch and regulate all illegal spam. The best way to
protect yourself is to do things like use your spam filter, don't put
your email address out on a public site, and just plain ignoring spam
and not replying to it.
No comments:
Post a Comment